Specifics

The page provides an overview of key features of the ITA Blockchain, including network parameters, network architecture, unique Proof-of-Game consensus, and comparison with other blockchains.

1. Challenges of Traditional Blockchain Models

Proof-of-Work (PoW)

  • High Energy Consumption

Mining requires substantial computational resources, leading to significant electricity usage.

  • Expensive Hardware

Effective mining necessitates specialized devices (ASICs, GPUs), limiting participation to larger entities.

  • Lack of Useful Work

Most computational power is spent on arbitrary calculations, offering no direct benefit.

Proof-of-Stake (PoS)

  • Centralization Risks

The concentration of tokens among a few participants can lead to reduced decentralization.

  • High Entry Barriers for Validators

Significant token holdings are required for block validation, discouraging smaller participants.

2. ITA’s Solution

ITA Blockchain replaces traditional computational work with gaming activity, converting player efforts into valuable network operations. This approach:

  • Reduces energy consumption.

  • Increases user engagement.

  • Expands decentralization by involving a broader range of participants from the gaming community.

3. Network Parameters

ITA Blockchain achieves a balance between speed, reliability, and security with optimized parameters. At the core are optimized parameters that allow the network to process transactions efficiently and integrate Proof-of-Game.

  • Block Time

10–30 seconds, ensuring rapid transaction confirmations.

  • Consensus Algorithm

A modified ETHASH incorporating Proof-of-Game metrics.

  • Throughput

Comparable to Ethereum, handling ~15-100+ transactions per second (TPS) based on optimizations.

  • Block Size

Adaptive, depending on the volume of transactions and Proof-of-Game data.

Parameter

Ethereum

ITA Blockchain

Block Time

~15 seconds

10-30 seconds

Consensus Algorithm

Proof-of-Stake (Casper)

Proof-of-Game (modified Ethash)

Throughput

~15 TPS (up to 100+ with upgrades)

~15-100+ TPS

Block Size

~1-2 MB.

Adaptive, scalable

For a detailed comparison with Ethereum, refer to the provided table.

4. Network Architecture

The ITA Blockchain architecture ensures reliability, security, and seamless integration with gaming projects.

  • Gaming Client

Lightweight software that does not burden GPU/CPU/RAM resources provides continuous analytics of gaming activity and payload generation for the network.

  • Masternodes

Basic work of validating blocks and hashes, ensuring the security and integrity of the network.

  • API

The unique API allows any game projects to be integrated into the ITA network, to track game activity and additionally reward players for high performance in a specific game.

5. Table of comparison with other blockchains

Parameter

ITA Blockchain

Ethereum

Bitcoin

Consensus

Proof-of-Game (PoG)

Proof-of-Stake (PoS)

Proof-of-Work (PoW)

Payload utility

High (Useful gaming activities)

Low (Focused on security only)

Low (Focused on security only)

Decentralization

High (Broad participation via gaming nodes)

Medium (Token concentration risks)

High (Many nodes, but high hardware costs)

Energy consumption

Low

Low

High

Integration with games

Yes

No

No

Block Time

10–30 seconds

~15 seconds

~10 minutes

Throughput

TPS ~15-100+

TPS ~15-100+

TPS ~7 TPS

Security mechanisms

Proof-of-Useful-Work, ML-analysis

Proof-of-Stake, Casper

Proof-of-Work, ASIC optimization

6. Comparative Analysis with Traditional Blockchains

ITA Blockchain offers a unique approach to addressing challenges commonly associated with traditional blockchain systems. The table below highlights the key differences between ITA Blockchain, Ethereum, and Bitcoin, including consensus mechanisms, workload utility, decentralization, energy consumption, and more.

This comparison showcases ITA Blockchain’s advantages and its potential in the gaming industry and beyond.

CONSENSUS MECHANISM

  • ITA Blockchain

Utilizes Proof-of-Game (PoG), integrating gaming activity with network consensus, enabling useful workloads tied to in-game actions.

  • Ethereum

Transitioned from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) through Ethereum 2.0, reducing energy consumption and increasing transaction speeds.

  • Bitcoin

Employs Proof-of-Work, which demands significant computational resources and energy consumption for mining.

UTILITY OF WORKLOAD

  • ITA Blockchain

High utility, as computational resources validate gaming actions that directly benefit the network.

  • Ethereum / Bitcoin

Low utility, as PoW and PoS focus solely on network security without providing additional functional benefits.

DECENTRALIZATION

  • ITA Blockchain

High decentralization, achieved through the participation of a broad range of gamers and diverse masternodes, preventing power concentration.

  • Ethereum

Moderate decentralization, as PoS may lead to token concentration among large validators.

  • Bitcoin

High decentralization due to widespread node distribution, though PoW’s high equipment costs can foster centralization.

ENERGY CONSUMPTION

  • ITA Blockchain

Low energy consumption, as PoG does not utilize GPUs for mining.

  • Ethereum

Low consumption after transitioning to PoS.

  • Bitcoin

High consumption due to PoW’s computational demands.

INTEGRATION WITH GAMING

  • ITA Blockchain

Yes, provides tools and mechanisms for seamless integration with gaming projects.

  • Ethereum / Bitcoin

No, neither blockchain is designed for direct integration with gaming platforms.

BLOCK TIME

  • ITA Blockchain

10–30 seconds, balancing speed and security.

  • Ethereum

~15 seconds.

  • Bitcoin

~10 minutes, significantly limiting transaction speed.

TRANSACTION THROUGHPUT

  • ITA Blockchain

~15–100+ TPS, comparable to Ethereum, with scalability potential.

  • Ethereum

~15 TPS (scalable to 100+ TPS with updates).

  • Bitcoin

~7 TPS, restricting transaction volume.

SECURITY MECHANISMS

  • ITA Blockchain

Employs Proof-of-Useful-Work and machine learning to analyze gaming activity, enhancing security and preventing fraud.

  • Ethereum

Implements PoS with Casper, ensuring security through token staking.

  • Bitcoin

Relies on PoW optimized for ASIC hardware, maintaining high security via computational costs.

7. Masternodes

Masternodes in ITA Blockchain are pivotal to the network’s functionality, offering:

  • Block and hash validation

  • Network synchronization

  • Stability and decentralization

For further details, refer to the “Masternodes → Overview” section.

PreviousOverviewNextSecurity

Last updated